requestId:684c3e367f2f34.20623444.
Thinking on the traditional and modern transformation problems of Confucius Education
Author: Bai Yuxiao
Source: “Fujian Forum” (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition) 2013 Issue 1
In traditional China, Confucianism, as an energetic and reorganized society, is embedded in the social organism and has repetitive and tangible characteristics. In the 20th century, with the interpretation of China’s traditional society, “Confucianism” has experienced the painful “revolution” and slowly retreated into the field of conception, becoming the “objective” of thinking and academic thinking such as civilization reflection, ideology and form criticism, and philosophical construction. From the late period of the last century to the first 10 years of this century, the Chinese thinking world emerged from the trend of “rebuilding Confucianism” and made a broad debate through specific civilized practices and card designs. This article will put forward a thought and suggestion on the traditional state, modern transformation and reconstruction of Confucianism. Regarding the “formality” of Confucianism, the Chinese academic community began in the 1980s and focused on whether “Confucianism” can be a “religion”. In 1980, Mr. Ren Yu, the teacher, first advocated the “Confucian Religious Discourse”, regarded Confucianism as a feudal ideology and described its “religious” characteristics. Rong Youlan, Zhang Dainian, Baocai.com VIP Li Jingquan and other teachers led the Zhang District to divide the religious Confucius religion into Han Dynasty and the Confucian traditions of the pre-Qin and Song and Ming dynasties, and positioned the traditional Confucius religion as thinking and philosophy. Mou Jingyan believes that Confucian tradition also has the existence form of “parental tradition religion”. (1) The discussion on the Confucian Education issue Baobao.com objectively promoted reflection on the Confucian education, broke through the limitations of traditional grasping the Confucian education from the perspective of thinking and philosophy, and reminded the close relationship between the Confucian education and the traditional feudal ideology and the state system. Disagreements with the academic community in the mainland, in the study of the Chinese academic community in Hong Kong, especially the neo-Confucianism, “Confucianism” is based on the “confucian spiritual tradition” and gained thoughts. On the one hand, the traditional “Confucianism” was processed as “philosophical Confucianism (teaching)” in the Neo-Confucianism. On the other hand, the New Confucianism will traditional “Confucianism”The defining sound of “teaching” is obviously not very consistent. It is positioned as “humanistic religion” or “moral religion”. It is different from Eastern religions, and rarely pays attention to the historical and social characteristics of Confucianism. As we entered the New Century, the research on the Confucianism form in the Chinese academic community has made new developments, and now the body is about the “religious nature of Confucianism” and “the system of Confucianism Pay attention to the aspects of form and other aspects. The religious thinking of Confucianism is mainly focused on the problem of “inner beyond nature” in Confucianism. Students such as Guo Qiyong, He Guanghuang, Du Weiming, and Zheng Jiaqi have sufficient discussions. Although there is a disagreement in the theoretical understanding of “outside nature”, there is a transcendence in traditional Confucianism. The spiritual energy tradition has become a common understanding in the academic community. Regarding the systemic problems of traditional Confucianism, the discussion of Gan Chunsong’s “Corporate Confucianism” and the development of “Political Confucianism” in Chinese, Li Xiangping’s religious and social assessment of Confucianism, and explained the systemic resources of traditional Confucianism. Characteristics: The contemporary Chinese academic community has gained new understanding of the humanistic and religious characteristics of Confucianism, and has gained a new grasp of the systemic characteristics of Confucianism.
The modern “reform” and “reconstruction” problems of Confucianism are contemporary Chinese scholars or The most concerned issue for scholars who have the landscape of Chinese civilization is behind it. The historical and civilized situations that Confucius faces in modern China, Levinson’s Confucianism “Museum Saying” and Yu Yingshi’s Confucianism “Wandering Soul Saying” have polite explanations, reminding Confucius in modern times The basic situation after the country has lost social soil and ruling support. The contemporary Chinese thought of “rebuilding Confucianism” responds to this kind of fundamental problem. Since this century, representatives of the “rebuilding Confucianism” thought include the “domineering politics” design of Kang Xiaoguang, the “confucianism” initiative, and Chen Ming’s “ready-to-use construction” The “confucian civilization protection zone” was structured and trapped here. I think, Huang Yushu’s exploration of “confucianism” in “life confucianism” has also sparked considerable disputes, such as Fang Keli criticized the above from the Marxist-theory Confucianism Research Department view. From an objective perspective, the discussion on the modern “reform” and “reconstruction” of Confucius is not simply an academic problem, but a practical problem closely related to the contemporary Chinese society and civilization construction.
About the traditional form and modern transformation of Confucius<a The idea of rebuilding women has been diversified and rich in results, but there are also problems that require objectivity, namely: the basic research and discussion of the traditional form of Confucius Education is not enough; although the "Confucian Reconstruction" has the intention to support Internet car and horse tax, it is difficult to become a "map" of certain civilization confidence and practical concepts, and both objectivity and feasibility are faced withrecommended online car and horse taxi href=”https://twsweetmeet.com/”>Sweetheart Baobabaobaobaobaobaobaobao. The author believes that the exploration and practice of “Confucianism reconstruction” still requires the following questions to be handled well: deeply官网彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩� href=”https://twsugargirl.org/”>Purchase network comparison and civilized situations; objectively understand the future development of Confucianism, and cannot be avoided. href=”https://sites.google.com/view/sugardaddy-story-share”>博官网 and “borrowing the corpse and re-enforcement” type reconstruction, and should follow the path of creation of “scaling new souls, shaping new forms, and raising new bodies”.
In viewing historical geography, we need to step out or prevent a series of binary opposing confusions created by traditional research and the limitations of the way of talking about Confucianism in the field of conception. The so-called “binary opposing confusion” refers to “Confucianism” and Baozhuang Club The rigid division of “Confucianism” is the separation of the main view of “political Confucianism” and “mind and nature Confucianism”, and the lack of defense of “religion” and “religiousness”. This dualistic condom of conception makes the mastery of traditional Confucianism separate rather than whole, and is set rather than observing rather than observing. Historical and contextual.
I believe that to master the morphological characteristics of traditional Confucianism, we need to “return to Confucianism itself”, that is, to master the basic morphological and historical characteristics of Confucianism as the “social existence” of Chinese traditional society and a public-collective “behavioral method”. The so-called Confucianism is a “social existence”, which means that Confucianism is not a natural existence. It is not just a certain collective energy phenomenon, nor is it a personal mental phenomenon. Confucianism has social structure and form. In the long history of traditional China, Confucianism, as a “social existence”, is a public-collective behavior method, with its structure and effectiveness, and a summary of the sentence that comes out: Science needs to be serious, but beauty… is not that important. Unique worship and value and the type of reticulum. The structural characteristics of Confucianism begin with the structure between behavior methods (including thinking methods and emotional methods) and socialized crystals (foreign rules, moral standards, legal systems and even corresponding social structures). The second is the relationship between its behavior methods and socialized crystals and specific soc
發佈留言